THE EFFECTS OF THE ANTI-ABORTION LAW
IN FORCE IN POLAND SINCE MARCH - 16 - 1993
REPORT No 2 |
Present accessibility of abortion in Poland
The law on family planning, human embryo protection and conditions of legal abortion, commonly known as anti-abortion law, has been in force in Poland since March 1993. According to the law abortion is legal in the following cases only:
The doctor who performs illegal abortion is subject to the punishment of up to two years of prison.
Any abortion must be performed in a public hospital.
Regulations in other countries
Polish abortion law belongs to the most restrictive ones in Europe. In definite majority of European countries abortion is accessible on woman's request. Even in those countries where accessibility of abortion is limited it is still more accessible than in Poland. In Spain, Portugal and Switzerland abortion is legal when pregnancy constitutes a threat to the life or health of the woman, including the threat to her mental health , as well as when the pregnancy is the result of rape or other sexual crimes and in the case of embryo damage. In Hungary abortion is legal additionally in case when a woman has difficult life conditions. Only Ireland has a more restrictive law than Poland. Abortion is legal in Ireland when the woman's life is threatened, including a situation when there is danger of suicide.
Outside Europe, abortion is accessible on request in the USA, Canada, post-Soviet countries, China, Mongolia, Singapore. Abortion is available in case of a difficult personal situation in six countries of Africa, in Australia, New Zealand, India, Japan, Korea and Malasia.
The effects of anti-abortion act
The introduction of the anti-abortion act immediately produced the effects that were easy to predict. Those effects were described in the first report by the Federation for Women and Family Planning prepared in May 1994(1)
.
The anti-abortion law is not observed and, moreover, it results in various abnormal phenomena. One of them is the existence of illegal abortions performed by means of "abortion underground" and "abortion tourism".
The underground abortion services are highly developed. This is evident from:
Permanent and regular appearance of those announcements and their growing number constitute an indirect proof of an existing and growing demand for this type of services.
It seems that abortion services are performed mainly in big cities; in smaller ones the doctors are too scared of getting caught. They decide to do abortion on women whom they know or who have been sent to them by their acquaintances and their decision is often spurred by humanitarian reasons and not only financial interests.
Abortion tourism is also highly developed.
Most women go to Poland's East and South neighbouring countries, e.g. to Lvov (Ukraine), Druskienniki (Lithuania), Kaliningrad (Russia), Minsk (Bielorus), to Czech Republic and Slovakia. Polish media repeatedly informed about abortion trips to Kaliningrad 4). The cost of abortion there is comparatively low (200 USD), but the sanitary conditions are bad and women often suffer medical complications.
Much fewer women can afford to seek abortion in Western countries. The abortions performed there are much more expensive but the medical services are of much better quality. Polish women most frequently go to Holland, Germany, Belgium and Austria. In one of the Berlin clinics of family planning we were told that their centre is visited by 15 Polish women a week. The price depends on how advanced the pregnancy is and on the type of anaesthesia (from 400 through 1,300 USD).
The Federation possesses the materials provided by an anonymous agency which was organising abortion trips to one of Polish southern neighbours. The agency started its service "immediately after the Code of Medical Ethics 5) came into force. It was that early that Polish doctors were threatened and refused to perform abortions. Before the anti-abortion law came into force we performed circa 20 abortions. After the anti-abortion law came into force for 2 or 3 months the doctors were so scared that they refused to do any abortions. (...) The greatest demand for our services existed in 1993, in the first 3 months after the law came into force. At that time in one of the neighbouring countries we could use the services of 2 private doctor's surgeries, one private clinic, 2 state hospitals, 6 gynaecologists, 3 anaesthesiologists and several nurses and we facilitated about 220-250 abortions. Later in 1993 we helped perform on average 60-70 abortions a month. In 1994 we facilitated on average 40-50 abortions a month. In this period we facilitated in total 1200 abortions. The demand for these services is seasonal, most are performed in spring and autumn."
The existence of abortion tourism has brought about the following legal proceedings so far:
|